Skip to content
Behind the Brand
05Digital Advertising

Who are weactually talking to?

  • Meta Ads
  • Audiences
  • WhatsApp
  • Metricool

Value created for the team

Gave the team clearer options for audience targeting, and a distribution routine so posts went out with a defined audience and timing.

Achievement

Built filtered Meta audiences by restaurant and occasion, and set up the scheduled distribution layer across WhatsApp copy, captions and Metricool.

In Week 2 I worked in Meta Ads Manager, sorting and filtering customer profiles to build targeted audiences. It was the first time I saw that a campaign is not one decision but two — what you say, and who is standing there when you say it.

The task

I filtered customer profiles into audiences that suited different restaurants and different occasions: someone looking for a casual weekday meal is not the same person as someone planning a date night or a celebration. The same content placed in front of the wrong group is not weak creative — it is a well-made advert being shown to someone with no reason to care.

How wide should an audience be?

Too broad

Budget spreads across people with no interest in the cuisine, the price point or the neighbourhood. Reach looks healthy, relevance falls, and the creative gets blamed for a targeting decision.

Too narrow

The audience may be too small to deliver efficiently, costs climb, the same people see the advert repeatedly, and genuinely interested customers just outside the filter are never reached.

Where I landed

There is no correct width in the abstract — it depends on what the campaign is for. Introducing a new menu to people who have never visited needs a wider net than filling weekday lunch covers for people who live nearby. Deciding the objective first is what makes the audience decision answerable.

Same lesson, different channel

On Day 4 I wrote WhatsApp marketing messages, social captions and hashtags, and scheduled posts in Metricool. WhatsApp is personal, so a message has to be short, relevant and easy to act on or it reads as spam on a channel people use for their friends. Hashtags follow the same rule as audiences: cuisine, location and occasion tags reach people already looking; generic tags reach volume that was never going to book.

Marketing is not about reaching everyone.

It is about reaching the people the objective depends on — and being honest that the definition of that group is a marketing decision, not a settings screen.

Filming a seafood paella on a wooden table under a continuous studio light
The creative is only half the decision. The other half is who ever sees it.

Evidence from the internship

The specific moments this case study is built on.

  1. Moment 01Week 2 · Meta Ads Manager

    I learnt to sort and filter customer profiles to build more targeted advertising audiences for different restaurants.

    My reaction

    I assumed strong creative would carry a campaign and targeting was an administrative step at the end.

    What changed

    Defining the audience changes what the creative should say. A message written for someone discovering a venue is not the message for someone who has already eaten there — so the audience decision has to come before the brief, not after it.

  2. Moment 02Day 4 · WhatsApp messages

    I wrote promotional WhatsApp copy for lunch sets, new menus and reservation reminders.

    My reaction

    My first drafts were full — every offer detail included, in case the customer wanted it.

    What changed

    On a personal channel, length reads as pressure. I cut to one clear offer and one next action, and started thinking about timing and relevance as part of the message rather than as scheduling admin.

  3. Moment 03Day 4 · Metricool scheduling

    I scheduled posts across accounts instead of publishing them individually.

    My reaction

    Scheduling looked like a convenience tool.

    What changed

    Planning ahead forces content to be seen as a sequence rather than a series of separate posts, which is where consistency and campaign timing actually come from.

The trade-off

Source — Week 2 Meta Ads Manager session and Week 4 content review

What pulled against what

Scale against precision; a single efficient campaign for the group against separate audiences per restaurant and per occasion.

Why the obvious answer was not enough

Reach without relevance spends money on people who were never going to visit, and the failure looks like a creative problem.

Why I chose this approach

Separate audiences per restaurant, filtered by interest, occasion, location and previous engagement, with the objective defined before the creative brief.

Going deeper

Why platform choice is part of the message

The same offer needs different shapes on different channels. WhatsApp is direct and action-focused, Instagram carries polish and atmosphere, TikTok needs a hook and a human reason to keep watching. Treating them as distribution points for one asset wastes the strengths of all three.

Evidence — Week 2 Meta Ads Manager session and Week 4 content review

The assumption I still want to test

I assumed occasion-based segmentation — casual lunch, date night, celebration — reflects how people actually decide. It is a reasonable model, but it is a model. Real booking data might show the divide is location or price sensitivity instead.

Evidence — Week 2 Meta Ads Manager session and Week 4 content review

The obvious answer

Make a strong advert and put budget behind it.

What was more complicated

Reach without relevance spends money on people who were never going to visit, and the failure looks like a creative problem.

What I would test nextProposed next test

I would test two audience widths against the same creative and compare cost per result, so audience decisions come from evidence rather than reasoning.

What I contributed

Gave the team clearer options for audience targeting, and a distribution routine so posts went out with a defined audience and timing.

I built filtered customer audiences in Meta Ads Manager for different restaurants and occasions, and produced the distribution layer around campaigns — WhatsApp copy, captions, hashtag sets and scheduled posts in Metricool — so content went out with a defined audience and timing rather than being published ad hoc.

Proposed next testNot internship work

Decision rules I would carry forward

  • The objective and the audience are written before the creative brief and stay visible during review.

    If I continued — the test

    For the next three campaigns, review creative with the audience line at the top of the page and record how often it changes a decision.

  • Audience width is treated as a test, not a guess: one broad and one narrow version always run together.

    If I continued — the test

    Split a small budget across a broad and a narrow audience for the same creative and compare cost per action, not reach.

  • Success is defined before a campaign runs; views alone never count as a result.

    If I continued — the test

    Agree one primary action per campaign — booking, save, enquiry — and track it for a month before judging any format.

Start every campaign with a written objective and audience definition, then choose the channel and let the creative follow from both.